From: Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review
Total | Blogs | ||||
Comment Received | N=96 | N=18 | N=64 | N=8 | N=6 |
Positive Comments | |||||
Praise of study | 57 (59%) | 6 (30%) | 45 (70%) | 1 (13%) | 5 (83%) |
Sharing personal experience | 15 (16%) | 1 (5%) | 14 (22%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Neegative Comments | |||||
Unsubstantiated critique of study methodology | 6 (6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3%) | 4 (50%) | 0 (0%) |
Forced niceness will weaken peer-review | 5 (5%) | 2 (10%) | 2 (3%) | 1 (13%) | 0 (0%) |
Difficulty adopting perspective of others | 6 (6%) | 3 (15%) | 2 (3%) | 1 (13%) | 0 (0%) |
Authors brought unprofessional comments upon themselves by submitting substandard work | 5 (5%) | 4 (22%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Not of relevance | 2 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (13%) | 1 (17%) |
Sharing over Social Media | Total | Blogs | |||
Tweets / Retweets / Shared without comments | 221 | 5 | 215 | 1 | 0 |