Skip to main content

Table 1 Percent of reviewer comment sets containing unprofessional comments or incomplete, inaccurate or unsubstantiated critiques (IIUC), divided by subject matter and by case studies (CS)

From: Quantifying professionalism in peer review

Topic

Survey Question

Overall

Ecology and Evolution

Behavioral Medicine

Total

Subject Total

CS1

CS2

CS3

CS4

Publons

Subject Total

CS5

CS6

Publons

Unprofessional Comments

Demeaned or Attacked the Author

12

18

35

18

9

15

10

7

4

6

7

Accusation of Questionable Research Practices

2

3

2

8

2

3

4

2

2

3

2

IIUC

Superficial Review

19

20

24

18

17

21

19

18

1

13

22

Inaccurate Statement About Clearly Stated Information in Draft

22

32

52

8

9

10

8

0

13

Arguments from Authority

27

36

56

34

40

33

25

20

12

31

19

Unaware of, or Criticizing Common Techniques that Are Supported by the Preponderance of Evidence

14

21

43

24

17

11

11

8

0

16

7

Claims of Missing Literature with no Citations or Direction offered.

19

27

54

18

21

23

14

12

10

10

13

 

1491RCS

666RCS

181RCS

38RCS

47RCS

80RCS

320RCS

825RCS

90RCS

135 RCS

600RCS

 

568MS

290MS

29MS

10MS

17MS

34MS

201MS

278MS

26MS

50MS

202MS

  1. RCS Reviewer comment set, MS Manuscript